盈彩网投资平台充值|在线用户注册首页登录平台
盈彩网投资平台返点2023-01-31 16:05

港澳台侨同胞福建宁德叙乡情话发展:共同讲好家乡故事******

  中新网宁德1月30日电 (林榕生)“在我眼中的宁德,城乡面貌发生了巨大变化,群众生活得到了明显改善。”加纳福建商会常务副会长、加纳新世纪矿业服务公司董事长钱世浩30日在福建省宁德市对中新网记者说。

  当天晚上,宁德市海外联谊会2023年新春恳亲座谈会举行,返乡过年和在宁的海外、港澳代表人士及海联会常务理事等40余人欢聚一堂,共叙乡情、共话发展。

  钱世浩说,宁德正华丽转身为宜业、宜居、宜游的新兴高新技术、能源、港口城市,将发挥自身人脉资源,保持好、维系好、拓展好自己的海外“朋友圈”,多种形式讲好中国故事、推介宁德发展,为家乡的经济建设更上一层楼略尽绵薄之力。

  地处福建东北部的宁德市,近年来发展形成锂电新能源、新能源汽车、不锈钢新材料、铜材料等四个具有国际竞争力的主导产业集群,并成长为福建高质量发展的重要增长极,经济总量从全省第8位晋升至第5位,一举跨入中国百强城市行列。

  “国内发展很好,商机也多。”2014年到安哥拉发展事业的安哥拉福建总商会副会长兼秘书长、世界福建青年联合总会副监事长林子清称,这些年,宁德的变化非常大,高楼林立,营商环境变好,民众的幸福指数也有很大的提升。

  看到家乡发展得越来越好,林子清在国内投资了市政工程,还和亲戚合伙从事养殖类的生意。她说,将通过自身对外宣传好宁德的优势,让更多的海外华侨华人回乡投资。

  2012年,香港宁德市同乡总会常务副会长、香港宁德市蕉城联谊会会长李哲生回乡从事家具设计及生产。20年来,李哲生一路见证了宁德的发展变迁。他说,近年来宁德发展迅速,未来发展空间大、商机多,将努力推动宁德与香港在文化交流和经济领域的合作,也将通过自身的资源及优势,做好宁德的“传声筒”,对外讲好宁德故事,为家乡建设、发展做贡献。

  宁德是福建的重点侨乡,宁德籍海外华侨华人达45.8万余人,遍布73个国家和地区。据官方不完全统计,目前,在宁德的侨(港澳)资侨(港澳)属企业有150多家,主要从事新能源、医药生物、房地产、石化、电机、酒店等产业。

  宁德市委统战部副部长、侨办主任、市海联会常务副会长陈良生表示,希望广大港澳台同胞、海外侨胞、海联会理事继续发扬爱国爱乡的优良传统,一如既往地关心、支持和参与家乡建设,共同为宁德全方位推进高质量发展作出新的更大贡献。(完)

盈彩网投资平台充值

中新网评:处理核污水绝不是日本自家私事******

  中新网北京1月19日电(蒋鲤)日本政府近日称,将于2023年春夏期间开始向海洋排放经过处理的福岛第一核电站核污水。日本罔顾国内民众及周边国家的屡屡反对,企图将核污水“一倒了之”,把一件关乎全球海洋生态环境和公众健康的事当成了自家私事。

资料图:日本福岛第一核电站。

  2011年,福岛核电站事故发生后,大量放射性物质泄漏到大气层和太平洋,对周围环境造成了难以逆转的伤害,数十万人被迫撤离该地区。时至今日,作为日本邻国之一的韩国仍未解除福岛海鲜禁令。

  日本以核污水存储能力即将达到上限为由,在2021年4月13日,正式决定将福岛第一核电站核污水排入太平洋。过去一年多,日本政府和东京电力公司一直在持续推进核污水排海计划。

  日本政府辩称,这些核污水经多核素处理系统(ALPS)处理后很安全,甚至“可以喝”,这样的表态无疑在愚弄大众。

  事实上,经过处理的核污水仍含有多种放射性物质,核污水一旦排放入海就无法回收,长期来看,将会给海洋生态带来难以估量的潜在威胁,最终危害人类健康。

  因此,核污水排海计划推出后,遭到日本民众强烈反对。日本《朝日新闻》2022年3月公布的问卷调查显示,福岛县、宫城县和岩手县受访的42个市町村长中,约六成反对东京电力公司福岛第一核电站核污水排放入海。日本全国渔业协会联合会也多次申明立场,反对该计划。

  日本政府认为,核污水排海是最便宜、最省事的解决方案,但此举却将周边国家乃至全世界置于核污染风险中。太平洋非日本一家之海,核污水会随着洋流流动,其影响势必会跨越国界,危害周边国家乃至整个国际社会的公共福祉和利益。

  《韩国经济新闻》发文称,相关研究认为,福岛核污水如果排放入海,约7个月后将到达济州等韩国海域,该国水产业和旅游业将遭受相当大的损失。

  德国南极海洋机构也曾发出警告,若日本将所有核污水排入海中,不到半年,整个太平洋都将面临高度辐射威胁,包括远在大洋另一端的美国。太平洋地区人民更是对日本该计划持反对意见。

  日本作为《联合国海洋法公约》缔约国,有义务保护海洋环境。然而,在核污水排海方案的正当性、核污水数据的可靠性、净化装置的有效性、环境影响的不确定性等问题上,日本未能作出科学、可信的说明。

  国际原子能机构技术工作组虽已三次赴日实地考察评估,但尚未就日排海方案的安全性给出结论,并且对日本提出诸多澄清要求和整改意见。在此情况下,日本仍执意推进核污水排海工程建设,这是极不负责任的行为。

  太平洋不是日本的下水道,日本必须正视各方合理关切,在与周边国家等相关利益方和国际原子能机构充分协商后,制定合理的核污水处理方案。日本也要着眼长远,若只顾眼前,执意将核污水排放入海,不仅其自身,周边国家乃至全世界都将为之买单,其后果必将会危害数代人。

  Fukushima water disposal by no means Japan’s own business

  By John Lee

  (ECNS) -- Japan has announced it will release treated wastewater from the wrecked Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant into the Pacific Ocean this year.

  Although Fukushima wastewater disposal affects global marine ecological environment protection and public health, Japan has turned a deaf ear to domestic and international opposition to dumping the contaminated water into the sea, treating the "global" matter as its own business.

  The Fukushima accident in 2011 had sent large quantities of radiation into the atmosphere and the Pacific Ocean, causing irreversible damage to the surrounding environment, and hundreds of thousands of people were forced to evacuate the area. South Korea still maintains its import ban on Japanese seafood from areas affected by the Fukushima nuclear disaster.

  On April 13, 2021, Japan announced it had decided to discharge contaminated radioactive wastewater in Fukushima Prefecture into the sea due to dwindling storage space, with the Japanese government and plant operator Tokyo Electric Power Company Holdings Inc. promoting the release plan over the past year.

  The Japanese government argues that the water treated by an advanced liquid processing system, or ALPS, is safe and drinkable, which is undoubtedly fooling the public.

  In fact, the treated wastewater still includes a variety of radioactive substances and can’t be recycled once discharged into the sea, which will pose a great threat to marine ecology and ultimately endanger human health in the long run.

  Therefore, the discharge plan has been strongly opposed in Japan. According to a questionnaire conducted by The Asahi Shimbun, nearly 60 percent of mayors of 42 municipalities in Iwate, Miyagi and Fukushima prefectures oppose the discharge plan. The National Fisheries Cooperative Federation of Japan has also repeatedly stated its opposition in public.

  The Japanese government believes that dumping Fukushima wastewater into the sea is the cheapest and most convenient solution, but neighboring countries and even the whole world will be at risk of nuclear pollution.

  The Pacific Ocean doesn’t belong to Japan and the wastewater flow along oceanic currents will surely break boundaries and endanger public welfare and the interests of neighboring countries and even the international community.

  The Korea Economic Daily reported that related research concluded that if contaminated water from Fukushima is released into the ocean, it would only take seven months for the contaminated water to reach the shores of Jeju Island, with the country's aquaculture and tourism suffering considerable losses.

  According to the calculation of a German marine scientific research institute, radioactive materials will spread to most of the Pacific Ocean within half a year from the date of discharge, and the U.S. and Canada will be affected by nuclear pollution. People in the Pacific region also oppose the discharge plan.

  As a participant of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, Japan has the obligation of protecting the marine environment.

  However, it hasn’t offered a full and convincing explanation on issues like the legitimacy of the discharge plan, the reliability of data on the nuclear-contaminated water, the efficacy of the treatment system or the uncertainty of environmental impact.

  Though the IAEA has yet to complete a comprehensive review after three investigations in Japan, the Japanese side has been pushing through the approval process for its discharge plan and even started building facilities for the discharge. It is rather irresponsible for Japan to act against public opinion at home and concerns abroad.

  The Pacific Ocean is not a private Japanese sewer. The country must seriously heed the voices of the international community and make a reasonable plan for the Fukushima wastewater disposal after full consultation with stakeholders and international agencies.

  If it only seeks instant interest and insists on discharging the contaminated water into the sea, not only itself, but also its neighboring countries and the entire world will pay for the decision and several generations will be forced to bear the consequence.

 

中国网客户端

国家重点新闻网站,9语种权威发布

盈彩网投资平台地图